[ICOM] QST - 7600

Jan Robbins swanman at cfu.net
Fri Oct 9 13:37:26 EDT 2009


I would certainly think Hans is right, that 7600/7700/7800 receiver 
performance is "very
close".  Simply looking at the circuitry suggests that.  Still, on-air 
performance at this QTH, plus
some external professional testing, favored the 7700.  On the other 
hand, look at the price tags of the three radios.  If performance
of all three is "very close," and you don't need 200w output, why 
wouldn't the 7600 be the "best buy?"

Jan

Hans Remeeus wrote:
> Receiver performance between the 7600/7700/7800 is very close:
> 
> http://www.remeeus.eu/ham-radio-english/transceivers/qst-product-reviews.html
> 
> 
> 73,
> Hans Remeeus (PA1HR)
> http://www.remeeus.eu
> Communication is about people, the rest is technology.
> 
> 
> John Geiger schreef:
>> --- On Fri, 10/9/09, Jan Robbins <swanman at cfu.net> wrote:
>>
>>> The 
>>> receiver data is
>>> especially impressive, coming out vy nearly as good as the
>>> 7700, which 
>>> is Icom's best.
>> Does the 7700 beat the 7800 in receiver performance?  
>>
>> I admit, the QST review of the 7600 is very tempting.
>>
>> 73s John AA5JG
>>
> 
> 
> __________ Informatie van ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versie van database viruskenmerken 4408 (20090908) __________
> 
> Het bericht is gecontroleerd door  ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Text inserted by Panda IS 2009:
> 
>  This message has NOT been classified as spam. If it is unsolicited mail (spam), click on the following link to reclassify it: http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_1781&SPAM=true&path=C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Jan\Local%20Settings\Application%20Data\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Internet%20Security%202009\AntiSpam
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 



More information about the Icom mailing list