[ICOM] QST - 7600

[Jan Robbins]

Hi John,
Check Adam's reviews (on his website) of the 7600, 7700, and 7800 re the 
receivers, etc.  That seems
to me the best place to get a good comparison.

 From actual experience here, with a 7800 next to a 7700 for a month, 
there is
no question in my mind the 7700 receiver is superior.  I no longer own a 
7800.

The review IS tempting, isn't it?  If I needed a rig, I'd sure want to 
study that 7600
a bit more.

73 Jan

John Geiger wrote:
> 
> --- On Fri, 10/9/09, Jan Robbins <swanman at cfu.net> wrote:
> 
>> The 
>> receiver data is
>> especially impressive, coming out vy nearly as good as the
>> 7700, which 
>> is Icom's best.
> 
> Does the 7700 beat the 7800 in receiver performance?  
> 
> I admit, the QST review of the 7600 is very tempting.
> 
> 73s John AA5JG
> 
> 
>       
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Text inserted by Panda IS 2009:
> 
>  This message has NOT been classified as spam. If it is unsolicited mail (spam), click on the following link to reclassify it: http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_1778&SPAM=true&path=C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Jan\Local%20Settings\Application%20Data\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Internet%20Security%202009\AntiSpam
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>