[ICOM] TX troubles on IC 7000

[AD5VJ Bob]

That's a good question John:

I don't know the answer, but Adam has such a feel for not
only the Ham Operator side of things but also for what
Icom (as a manufacturer and developer) has to battle that
I hope he answers both our questions.

I know many times as operators we tend to look at it from
our own bottom line point of view (do it work or don't it)
while not considering the marketing, Q&A, Development side
of things that I was hoping Adam could help shed some
light where we could all understand it better.

He seems to have a balance of it all for some reason,
which is one reason why I love reading this group.

 

  73 fer nw,
Bob AD5VJ

10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177
http://www.n5iet.com/
Code may be taking a back seat for now,
but the pioneering spirit that put the code
there in the first place is out front of it all.




> -----Original Message-----
> From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of John
Geiger
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:52 PM
> To: ICOM Reflector
> Subject: Re: [ICOM] TX troubles on IC 7000
> 
> Is this problem similar to the one on the 746PRO which
was 
> well documented as a design failure?
> 
> 73s John NE0P
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "'ICOM Reflector'" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 5:39 AM
> Subject: RE: [ICOM] TX troubles on IC 7000
> 
> 
> > Thanks Adam:
> >
> > I joined too.
> >
> > I would like to ask you about someone's previous post,
which really 
> > disturbed me.
> >
> > I have been a loyal Icom user through the IC730, 729
and 
> now 756PRO. I 
> > have never had any trouble with *any* of mine except
the usual mods 
> > that EVERYONE does.
> >
> > They are all solid as rocks IMHO.
> >
> > Do you have a feel for why Icom would not make the
change 
> without cost 
> > to the customers just after paying that much for a
radio like the 
> > 7000?
> >
> > Or is it not quite a simple as it might seem as far as
the 
> whole issue 
> > is concerned I mean? In other words is there more to
it 
> than meets the 
> > eye on the surface?
> >
> >
> >
> >   73 fer nw,
> > Bob AD5VJ
> >
> > 10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177
> > http://www.n5iet.com/
> > Code may be taking a back seat for now, but the
pioneering 
> spirit that 
> > put the code there in the first place is out front of
it all.
> > ,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > > [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
Adam
> > Farson
> > > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:41 PM
> > > To: 'ICOM Reflector'
> > > Subject: RE: [ICOM] TX troubles on IC 7000
> > >
> > > Hi Oms,
> > >
> > > You will need to subscribe. To speed up the approval
> > process,
> > > please indicate your callsign in your subscription
> > request.
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ic7000/
> > >
> > > Cheers for now, 73,
> > > Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > > [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
PY5EG
> > > Sent: 06 March 2006 14:00
> > > To: 'ICOM Reflector'
> > > Subject: RES: [ICOM] TX troubles on IC 7000
> > >
> > >
> > > Where can I find list of the Reflector IC 7000
messages?
> > > Best 73
> > > Oms PY5EG
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Scanned for viruses by Blue Coat
> > > http://www.WinProxy.com/
> > > ----
> > > Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC,
> > > icom-owner at mailman.qth.net Icom Users Net: Sundays,
> > 1700Z,
> > > 14.316 MHz Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> > >
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC,
icom-owner at mailman.qth.net Icom 
> > Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz Icom FAQ: 
> > http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> >
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, 
> icom-owner at mailman.qth.net Icom Users Net: Sundays,
1700Z, 
> 14.316 MHz Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>