[ICOM] IC-775 vs. IC-756 ProII/III

John Germanos wb9pnu at charter.net
Tue Jul 18 08:16:56 EDT 2006


Wonder why 775 is not on the new list. How good does it get with Inrad 
roofing filter?

John WB9PNU
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob AD5VJ" <rtnmi at sbcglobal.net>
To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: [ICOM] IC-775 vs. IC-756 ProII/III


>A good friend on mine looked this up and found this data. Which is rather 
>interesting to say the least:
>
> ---
> Check out this table, the 775 has much better
> performance on close in IMD:
>
> http://www.sherweng.com/Dayton_2004/Dynamic_Range_Data.pdf
>
> ---
> BOB AD5VJ
> http://www.ad5vj.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Edward Dickinson, III" <softblue at alltel.net>
> To: "'ICOM Reflector'" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 8:06 AM
> Subject: [ICOM] IC-775 vs. IC-756 ProII/III
>
>
>> Some of the ICOM users here may have owned/operated both the IC-775DSP 
>> and
>> one or the other of the later IC-756Pro models.
>>
>> Would you care to share you thoughts, pros and cons, and other 
>> evaluations?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dick - KA5KKT
>>
>> ----
>> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/390 - Release Date: 7/17/2006
>
> 


More information about the Icom mailing list