[ICOM] NO MORE TS-2000 vs. IC-910H DISCUSSION

[Tony Hwang]

Michael Raskin wrote:

> Since I was the "one" who originally asked a legitimate question about 
> comparing the IC-910H and the TS-2000, I would like to step in and 
> apologize for the subsequent boring and nasty comments that followed.  
> I do thank those who provided substantive and meaningful 
> information.   I have been on this reflector for many years and I love 
> all of the Icoms which I have previously owned (775, 781, and 756 PRO 
> series).  I now have a 7800 which is the best yet "for my needs."   My 
> question was raised because I wanted to try weak signal 2M CW and, 
> eventually, SAT.  The TS-2000 and IC-910H are the two currently 
> produced rigs which can easily do this.  I posted my original query on 
> both this reflector and the Kenwood reflector.  I received many 
> comments on this reflector, including some sarcastic, condescending, 
> and belittling ones.  The Kenwood reflector exhibited none of this 
> (maybe because there are not many TS-2000 users on SAT).  However, all 
> replies on the Kenwood reflector were informative and cordial.  One 
> individual has both the TS-2000 and IC-910H and another had used both 
> but kept the TS-2000.  I was only trying to get some consensus as 
> which one would better suit my needs.  Instead, I got a lot more than 
> I asked for.  If anyone has any constructive comments concerning 
> comparison of the two rigs, please reply privately to my email address 
> at w4um at arrl.net.
>
> Mike, W4UM (ex-K4KUZ)
> South Florida DX Association - www.qsl.net/k4fk
> Mid Florida DX Association - www.w4fdx.com
> Florida Contest Group - www.floridacontestgroup.org
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>
Hi,
Reminds  me, "Empty cart rattles louder" I am using Yaesu 736R fully 
loaded. It does what I need/want.
73,
Tony, VE6CGX