[ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910

[John Geiger]

I agree about the 2 radios, but it is sure nice to
have a backup HF in case the dedicated HF goes down. 
I would rather be using a TS2000 on HF for a while
then QRT on HF with a 910H.

73s John W5TD

--- Michael Raskin <rask1553 at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Bill - Thanks for your thoughts.  The only reason I
> was leaning to the 2000 
> was because it has 6M.  I know my 7800 has 6 but I
> am always concerned that 
> I need a 6M backup and I could miss a new one!
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "William Lambing" <w0lpq9 at msn.com>
> To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 6:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910
> 
> 
> Mike, I still say that the 910 is no slouch when it
> comes to the receiver. 
> It heard FM stuff that my normal receiver did not. 
> That was during the 
> initial installation.  Antenna was a ground plane at
> 35 feet.
> 
> I still think it is preferable to have two dedicated
> radios, for UHF/VHF and 
> one for HF.
> 
> Bill, W0LPQ
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC,
> icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC,
> icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com