[ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910

[Michael Raskin]

Bill - Thanks for your thoughts.  The only reason I was leaning to the 2000 
was because it has 6M.  I know my 7800 has 6 but I am always concerned that 
I need a 6M backup and I could miss a new one!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William Lambing" <w0lpq9 at msn.com>
To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910


Mike, I still say that the 910 is no slouch when it comes to the receiver. 
It heard FM stuff that my normal receiver did not.  That was during the 
initial installation.  Antenna was a ground plane at 35 feet.

I still think it is preferable to have two dedicated radios, for UHF/VHF and 
one for HF.

Bill, W0LPQ
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/