[ICOM] IC-2KL on 240v

D C *Mac* Macdonald k2gkk at hotmail.com
Fri Sep 23 10:01:49 EDT 2005


I believe that if phasing were reversed,
either in parallel connection for 120VAC
usage or series for 240VAC, the output
would be ZERO since the vector sum
of each winding's output would be
opposing each other.

I also believe that reversed phasing in the
case of parallel connection would certainly
not do the transformer itself any good!!!

Mac, K2GKK/5



----Original Message Follows----
From: "Bert" <balmemo at sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
To: "'ICOM Reflector'" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: RE: [ICOM] IC-2KL on 240v
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:50:45 -0400

Great point! I forgot to mention that in my earlier response.

73 Bert, VE3OBU


-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of Sheldon Daitch
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 9:38 AM
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: Re: [ICOM] IC-2KL on 240v


Since I do not have an IC-2KL, I don't know how the transformer is marked,
or laid out.

The phasing of the two primary windings is also important, and if they are
not wired properly, in series, (or in parallel, for that matter on 120VAC),
you won't get the proper voltage on the secondary side.

Just a thought, or am I making it more confusing?

73
Sheldon
WA4MZZ

----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net Icom Users
Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/

----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/




More information about the Icom mailing list