[ICOM] ic-746 filters
Jim Vohland
n9vo at hotmail.com
Wed Apr 13 20:58:57 EDT 2005
When I had a 746, I found the combo of the FL222 and FL223 worked very well.
The fl222 is a bit pricey but I think it was worth it. I really do believe
you need to run both to have the best setup. If you are interested, I have a
extra fl222. Contact me direct so as to not tie up the reflector.
>From: yash at aol.com
>Reply-To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
>To: icom at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: [ICOM] ic-746 filters
>Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:29:21 -0400
>
>Just picked up a nice 746...Was looking to add 3 filters 2 at the ist if
>and 1 at the second. Looking at icoms filters kind of limited ,bur inrad
>offers a few more. Iam looking at ssb not cw at this point and was
>wondering what combo on both if's would give a really usable pair? I do
>local and dx not much of a contester. Was thinking of the 2.8 and the
>1.9 at 9mhz and 1.8 ay 455khz.Inrad offers a few differant filters also .
> Just curious as to what others have found to be a usable combo.
>thanks for the time
>dale k8qi
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
More information about the Icom
mailing list