[ICOM] ic-746 filters

Jim Vohland n9vo at hotmail.com
Wed Apr 13 20:58:57 EDT 2005


When I had a 746, I found the combo of the FL222 and FL223 worked very well. 
The fl222 is a bit pricey but I think it was worth it. I really do believe 
you need to run both to have the best setup. If you are interested, I have a 
extra fl222. Contact me direct so as to not tie up the reflector.

>From: yash at aol.com
>Reply-To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
>To: icom at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: [ICOM] ic-746 filters
>Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:29:21 -0400
>
>Just picked up a nice 746...Was looking to add 3 filters 2 at the ist if 
>and 1 at the second. Looking at icoms filters kind of limited ,bur inrad 
>offers a few more. Iam looking at ssb not cw at this point and was 
>wondering what combo on both if's would give a really usable pair? I do 
>local and dx  not much of a contester. Was thinking of the 2.8 and the 
>1.9 at 9mhz and 1.8 ay 455khz.Inrad offers a few differant filters also .
>  Just curious as to what others have found to be a usable combo.
>thanks for the time
>dale k8qi
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/



More information about the Icom mailing list