[ICOM] 706 Filters
Tony Hwang
dragon40 at shaw.ca
Thu Sep 16 22:32:10 EDT 2004
Stephen Budensiek wrote:
>Neil,
> I can only speak for the 250 hz cw filter. The filter is in the 9 mhz
>IF, so blow past is evident if you have real strong stations. The 706
>does wonders in the mobile, but on my TH11, or 2 ele on 40m at 120 ft on
>the small mountain I'm on, 400 ft HAAT, or the 80m full-sized 4square, you
>better use the attenuator. Long as you keep the signals down, the 250 hz
>does wonders. I've worked lot of CW mobile while I was driving, much
>easier copy with the 250 hz filter, especially when working split in
>dx-peditions and pile-ups. I haven't counted, but have at least 100
>countries on CW mobile, over 150 on all modes, using a 10 ft whip (most the
>time) and an AH4. On 40 & 80, I change out to a Hustler with a 40 or 75m
>top, have worked run's on Europeans on 40m just after sunset, really enjoy
>it.
>
>73's de Stephen, K0SD in NC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Neil Zimmerman [SMTP:nwzimm at rmci.net]
>Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 1:29 PM
>To: ICOM
>Subject: [ICOM] 706 Filters
>
>I'm using the Icom 706 and was using a narrow ssb filter. I want to
>install the narrow cw filter and I'm interested if it does a better job
>then the ssb filter ? Any comments ?
>
>Tnx, Neil/NB7Q
>
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>
>
Hi,
Some times 250Hz is little too narrow for quick tuning. 500Hz is all
around good one.
BTW, best filter is between our two ears, LOL.
73,
Tony, VE6CGX
More information about the Icom
mailing list