[ICOM] New Pro III - Hold On Guys!
John Geiger
johngeig at yahoo.com
Sun Aug 22 13:22:14 EDT 2004
Hi Adam,
But weren't the 761 and 765 pretty close in circuit
design? It is interesting why one got a new number,
whereas the other one got just a letter. I would
think that there would be a bigger difference going
between the 751 and 751A than between the 761 and 765.
73s John NE0P
--- Adam Farson <farson at shaw.ca> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> In terms of architecture, the 751 and 751A were
> similar, but the 751A was a
> complete revision in terms of circuit design. This
> differs from the 761/765
> case, where there were significant architectural
> differences.
>
> Cheers for now, 73,
> Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
>
>
>
>
> Scanned by WinProxy
> http://www.Ositis.com/
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC,
> icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
More information about the Icom
mailing list