[ICOM] New Pro III - Hold On Guys!

[K2SNJ]

I am considering a TenTec Jupiter. Has anyone compared one to a 746pro or
756pro for receiver selectivity and sensitivity?

Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Icom 765" <icom765 at hotmail.com>
To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [ICOM] New Pro III - Hold On Guys!


> I have to agree with your logic Dave.  Mine is a little different.  I
cannot
> see any reason to upgrade from my IC 765.  Not to throw gas on the fire,
> but, pick a contest day ... anyone here in the US.  Put a 765 on the table
> with say any of the newer Icoms (I don't want to pick on any particular
> one).  Add a TenTec Jupiter ... then decide which one you think is better.
> Could be a VERY hard choice depending what your operating style is and
what
> you like.
>
> 73, Mike
>
>
> >From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e at comcast.net>
> >Reply-To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> >To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> >Subject: Re: [ICOM] New Pro III - Hold On Guys!
> >Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:05:01 -0400
> >
> >But I am not sure how I lose a ton of money, and how Icom will make more
> >money.
> >My Pro works great, and I see no reason to trade up.
> >If there was a circuit which caused my Pro to self-destruct  when the Pro
2
> >came out, well...that would then be a money making scheme (to say the
> >least!!)
> >...Dave
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>