[Icom] ANC 4 vs MFJ 1026
Siu Johnny
[email protected]
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:37:29 +0800
Hi John,
I used ANC 4 with my IC756 before and it worked very well. Since the noisy
power line had gone, I do not use it now. However, I still keep it as I
like its quality. The construction quality of MFJ1026 is comparatively
inferior. Together with the famous poor QC of MFJ products, I shall not
recommend 1026.
Through years of unhappy experience with MFJ products (very poor QC), I
know the way to handle it. Each time I make my order, I shall specifically
ask the dealer to test the equipment first before shipping it to Hong Kong.
If you need further information, please email me direct because it is a
ICOM mail group.
73
Johnny Siu VR2XMC
From: John Geiger <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected],
[email protected],[email protected],
[email protected],[email protected]
Subject: [Icom] ANC 4 vs MFJ 1026
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
Looking at buying one of these noise cancelling units
to deal with power line noise here. Have found good
deals on each one. Does anyone have experience with
both of them, and can tell me which one is the one to
get? I know that some people hate MFJ and have had
bad luck with them, but I am one of the lucky ones. I
have had several pieces of MFJ equipment, and they
have always worked for me, so the brand name alone
doesn't sway me one way or another.
73s John NE0P
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
_________________________________________________________________
�ϥΥ��y�̦h�H�ϥΪ��q�l�l��A�� MSN Hotmail�Ghttp://www.hotmail.com