[Icom] No Anti Dsp Conspiricy Exists

Tue, 21 May 2002 23:32:04 -0400

Might have on the pro but not the Pro II. I have owned the FT920 and it's a
nice radio and still own my original FT1000D and I can tell you....Icom did
not botch the DSP or receiver on this radio. As much as I love my
FT1000D...the Pro II gets used most of the time. You have to learn and know
how to use all that it offers though or you will never like it or enjoy
it....73, Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "HFSSB" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Icom] No Anti Dsp Conspiricy Exists


> Hi Tony, the 920 receiver can hold its own with any Ham rig out there*.
As far
> as I can tell Icom and Kenwood have yet to equal the DSP (especially in
noise
> reduction) of the 920 (*haven't tried a proII or FT1000mp or V).  I agree
with
> you on the DSP compared to the 746 but I rate the 746 very highly as a
receiver
> in its class, a very nice package.  From what I'm seeing on this list, it
sounds
> like Icom botched the 746Pro but that's just hearsay on my part.
>
> Marty
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hfssbaudio/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: [Icom] No Anti Dsp Conspiricy Exists
> hi marty,in your opinion how did you rate the reciever on the 920?I
thought
> it was above avg,and the dsp was much better than the 746.but i must say
the
> 570dg was a close second to the 920.I no longer own the 920 but sure do
miss
> that big rig.I sold the 920,746 and my 990/dc to buy brand new 756 pro and
> the ts-870s.Im happy with the trade off but sure do miss the 920 and
990.73
>
> tony k2vi
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>