[Icom] External Audio Filter
Michael P. Olbrisch
[email protected]
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:27:33 -0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of George, W5YR
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:28 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Icom] External Audio Filter
>
>
>
> I believe that the most nearly comparable currently available
> new unit approaching the NIR-12 is the filter made by Timewave.
> I do not recall the exact name but it is something like the
> DSP599X.
That is an interesting comment. I had both side by side for a
while, and found the DSP-599zx to be the better unit. Although
the NIR-12 is no longer here, I believe the latest DSP-599zx
upgrades would make it a far superior choice when coupled to
my IC-781. When correctly adjusted, The DSP-599zx edged
out the NIR-12 even back then.
I find it not only useful for my IC-781, but I use it's second input
on my IC-820H. It is quite helpful in reducing the noise on the
AO-40 satellite S-band downlink. I have set it up on my 900 MHz
headphones, so I get the IC-820 audio on the left side, and the
IC-781 audio on the right side. (The DSP-599zx has two separate
inputs). I set it up so the AUX input (easily switchable) is 15dB
down from the primary input. That way, when I am listening to
AO-40, I can keep the H.F. radio in the background, but still hear
the net. Likewise, I can work H.F., but still hear the V/UHF quietly
in the background. In fact, a friend and I compared my IC-781
with the DSP-599zx to his then new IC-756. Other then the
aforementioned AGC affect, we saw no reason for me to sell out
and get an IC-756. Now before we start... it was NOT A PRO or
a PRO-II. Have not tried that comparison... has anyone?
Which feature did you think was better on the NIR-12?
Mike. KD9KC