[Icom] IC 756 Pro II vs FT1000MP MKV

Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:34:02 -0600

Yep, apples & oranges.

At 04:40 PM 12/27/02 -0800, you wrote:
>QC issues aside,
>(Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?)
>
>OK, if we can get past the quality issue (which would probably turn me off
>from getting a MkV anyway), what about performance?
>
>How about a Pro2 versus a used 1000D, or K2 (or is that going too far into
>the "apples and oranges" direction)?
>
>TIA
>Roy
>AD6ZU
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kenneth Nilsson
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: 12/27/02 8:29 AM
>Subject: [Icom] IC 756 Pro II vs FT1000MP MKV
>
>Hello out there!
>Well I know this is not the appropriate plece
>to put a question like this but perhaps any of
>you has compared the Pro II to FT1000 MP MKV (Field).
>I consider to buy a new rig and do hesitate shat to
>buy. Today I use an ICOM 765 teogether with the
>IC2KL and the AT-500. Those works nice together but
>I miss a separate receiver.
>Do you hva any experiences or advise, I will appreciate
>those very much.
>Working mainly DX and contests on CW and SSB but also
>enjoy a ragshew now and then.
>Best 73 and a Happy New Year to all of You de
>Ken / SM7CQY
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>
>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
>The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
>or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
>Please post in Plain-Text only.---
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/