[Icom] What am I missing here?

John L Merrill [email protected]
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:37:21 -0400


Paul Playford wrote:
> Recently I did receiver sensitivity measurements on several different
> transcievers and I didn't find anything that came close to what the ARRL lab
> observed.  I used the same procedure they do with fairly well calibrated
> equipment but come up with different results.  Some better, some worse, all
> different.  And MAJOR differences.  So my conclusion is forget the specs,
> just go with whatever turns your crank.
> 
> Besides, what may be best for weak signal, 20 meter cw DX probably won't
> work worth a darn for local ssb rag chewing on 75m.
> 
> And I found a real good way to get a rig owner upset.  Just show him how the
> numbers on his radio compared to others.
> 
> BTW, I found it not possible to observe MDS on an Omni VI+ as there was no
> place where I could not hear birdies.  So my MDS on the Omni VI+ was
> measured to a weaker birdy, not receiver noise.
> 
> de Paul, W8AEF
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Geiger <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 6:49 PM
> Subject: [Icom] What am I missing here?
> 
> 
> 
>>I AM CONFUSED!!
>>
>>This all started a couple of weeks ago when someone
>>posted a rig for sale, and showed that its receiver
>>numbers were comparable to the OMNI VI+. I dont
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 

Now that you got everyone curious, will you post your results?

John N1JM