[Icom] What am I missing here?
John L Merrill
[email protected]
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:37:21 -0400
Paul Playford wrote:
> Recently I did receiver sensitivity measurements on several different
> transcievers and I didn't find anything that came close to what the ARRL lab
> observed. I used the same procedure they do with fairly well calibrated
> equipment but come up with different results. Some better, some worse, all
> different. And MAJOR differences. So my conclusion is forget the specs,
> just go with whatever turns your crank.
>
> Besides, what may be best for weak signal, 20 meter cw DX probably won't
> work worth a darn for local ssb rag chewing on 75m.
>
> And I found a real good way to get a rig owner upset. Just show him how the
> numbers on his radio compared to others.
>
> BTW, I found it not possible to observe MDS on an Omni VI+ as there was no
> place where I could not hear birdies. So my MDS on the Omni VI+ was
> measured to a weaker birdy, not receiver noise.
>
> de Paul, W8AEF
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Geiger <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 6:49 PM
> Subject: [Icom] What am I missing here?
>
>
>
>>I AM CONFUSED!!
>>
>>This all started a couple of weeks ago when someone
>>posted a rig for sale, and showed that its receiver
>>numbers were comparable to the OMNI VI+. I dont
>
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
Now that you got everyone curious, will you post your results?
John N1JM