[HomeBrew] More variable capacitor
N1KHB--- via HomeBrew
homebrew at mailman.qth.net
Fri Oct 24 21:22:29 EDT 2014
Hi Ron,
You may have a point with the metallic layer thickness, but you may
have missed my point about accessing the metal layer by removal of the
protective coating and thus making contact with threaded rod and spacers in the
form of nuts and possibly washers. This assembly process would be used as the
stator sections. This brings us back to the original question of whether
the individual rotor discs need to be electrically connected together
remains open. If they do not, then removal of coating for those discs is not
needed.
Best,
Sonny N1KHB
In a message dated 10/24/2014 6:41:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ka4inm at gmail.com writes:
** Please do NOT cross-post messages when posting to HOMEBREW **
On 10/24/14 16:59, N1KHB--- via HomeBrew wrote:
> ** Please do NOT cross-post messages when posting to HOMEBREW **
> Hi Dick et all,
> I want to build a magnetic loop antenna which requires a variable
> capacitor on the antenna in order to bring it into resonance. The
rotor-stator
> type is disliked for it's lossy frame connection to the rotor. Split
stator,
> and less popularly, butterfly capacitors are used instead. These caps
are
> expensive and hard to find. Some people then come up with their own
ideas -
> trombone capacitors with one pipe sliding inside of another, and other
> designs are on the web.
> Then it dawned on me that CD's have a metal layer embedded within,
so
> the idea that it might be possible to build a variable capacitor out of
> CD's which have that metal layer in them. The entire mechanics are
still only
> fragmented thoughts floating around in my head, but the basic idea is
that
> I could build the stator sections by stacking and spacing by some
> appropriate distance with threaded rod with the lacquer layer stripped
away somehow
> for contact. Then if the rotors didn't need to be stripped too it would
> make assembly that much easier. But if electrical contact is actually
> necessary in the rotor plates, I would need to do that much more work.
> Hence the original question of whether a collection of isolated
plates
> inserted into the stator area would still function to disallow varying
> degrees of charge between the "blocked" stator plate areas depending
on rotor
> position. If I had a C meter, I'd be able to just do a mockup to see
what
> happens. That mockup would consist of two plates acting as the two
stator
> sections, with a single isolated plate being moved into and out of the
stator
> plates to see if the C value changes. So my thinking is that if it does,
> then multiple isolated rotor plates would act similarly on more stator
> plates. My intuition says that it should work, yet some say no. Mostly
just
> trying to save some lacquer removal work in the end, but it also became
an
> interesting mental exercise. I should know the answer to this with my
> background, but it hasn't surfaced as yet.
** Please do NOT cross-post messages when posting to HOMEBREW **
There is not enough aluminum sputtered on to CD and DVDs to be
conductive, you can see right through them if the "paint job" is removed.
There is also no way to connect a wire to the aluminum coating on them.
If you could you really need an extremely low inductance connection
individual wires will not do.
You would be better off looking into copper foil between sheets of
glass, "compression capacitors" have been made that way in early radio.
Whatever you build must be effectively water proofed.
** Please do NOT cross-post messages when posting to HOMEBREW **
--
Ron KA4INM - Youvan's corollary:
Every action results in unwanted side effects.
______________________________________________________________
HomeBrew mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/homebrew
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:HomeBrew at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the HomeBrew
mailing list