[Heathkit] Heathkit Digest, Vol 60, Issue 20

[Paul Kraemer]

I agree with Mike 100 pct.
I don't like the situation either, but let us move on, please!
Paul K0UYA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy at verizon.net>
To: <heathkit at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Heathkit] Heathkit Digest, Vol 60, Issue 20


> Folks,
>
> The discussion on copyrights is mildly interesting but the flaming is
> getting tedious.  I thought hams were mostly above that sort of bad
> behavior.  We can agree to disagree without calling names.  I for one 
> would
> ask that this cease toot sweet.
>
> That said, I sure hope d8apro isn't expecting to fund his retirement with
> revenues from this (mis)adventure.  Regardless of all the legalities
> involved, the whole thing seems to me to be small-minded and cheap.  My 
> two
> cents, please keep the flamethrowers pointed inwards.
>
> 73
> Mike W2IY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: heathkit-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:heathkit-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
> heathkit-request at mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 12:00 PM
> To: heathkit at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Heathkit Digest, Vol 60, Issue 20
>
> Send Heathkit mailing list submissions to
> heathkit at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/heathkit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> heathkit-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> heathkit-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Heathkit digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: BAMA and Heathkit docs??? (Carl)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:41:00 -0500
> From: "Carl" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
> Subject: Re: [Heathkit] BAMA and Heathkit docs???
> To: <jbrannig at optonline.net>
> Cc: "heathkit at mailman.qth.nt" <heathkit at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <4B300C1990B748459D93E1F5294ECF63 at KITTYMA123>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> You must have figured out that response after spending 15 minutes
> staring into the mirror. I hope you didnt drool too much.
>
> Carl
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <jbrannig at optonline.net>
> To: "Carl" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
> Cc: "heathkit at mailman.qth.nt" <heathkit at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Heathkit] BAMA and Heathkit docs???
>
>
>>
>> Jeez Carl, you are are a clue less SOM bitch, a  miserable curmudgeon
>> and a major ass
>> hole...there is simply no other way to describe you........
>>
>> Jim
>>> Nicely said Tom.
>>>
>>> A few on here dont realize the years we have had access to that
>>> free
>>> info on several venues. Its like telling that old man he cant
>>> drive any
>>> longer after he passed his tests with flying colors.
>>>
>>> Also the US was founded on civil disobedience so I have a clear
>>> conscience with whatever path I take.. Jeez, never thought I
>>> would start
>>> sounding like a smelly 60's hippie war protester!
>>>
>>> I wonder how libraries get around the copyright hassle since you
>>> can
>>> copy just about anything available without stating a purpose.
>>>
>>> Maybe every university needs a Heathkit data base for reference
>>> and
>>> research.
>>>
>>> Carl
>>> KM1H
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Tom Chesek"
>>> To: "heathkit at mailman.qth.nt"
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:43 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Heathkit] BAMA and Heathkit docs???
>>>
>>>
>>> > But if you left your old worn out car in a field and let
>>> everyone's
>>> > kids play in it for years and then some cranky old man bought
>>> the old
>>> > worn out car and started charging those kids admission to play
>>> in the
>>> > car would you blame the kids for being annoyed? Yes, the old
>>> man has
>>> > those legal rights but we have our right to be annoyed!
>>> >
>>> > Tom K3TVC
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> > From: "Jim Brannigan"
>>> > To: "Duane Fischer, W8DBF" ; "Larry WA9VRH"
>>> > ; "Carl" ; "Dan
>>> Pividal"
>>> > ; "heathkit at mailman.qth.nt"
>>> >
>>> > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:30 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: [Heathkit] BAMA and Heathkit docs???
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Nicely said Duane.
>>> >> Most people don't realize that intellectual property is an
>>> asset,
>>> >> like any other.
>>> >> If someone were to take your car and drive it (even to a
>>> foreign
>>> >> country) it is theft and all the bad mouthing and vitriol
>>> does not
>>> >> change it.
>>> >>
>>> >> Jim
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> End of Heathkit Digest, Vol 60, Issue 20
> ****************************************
>