[Heathkit] Re: 6293 tube question
Ken Kaplan
krkaplan at cox.net
Sat Oct 25 16:00:06 EDT 2008
Ok - I don't doubt that Glen is right about the 6293 being a "tougher" 6146. What I haven't
been able to figure out is how they (the manufacturers) did it. I examined a 6293 and a 6146
under a 10x-30x stereo microscope and I'd swear on a stack of good matched pair gold pin
cryogenic treated shot peened magnafluxed 6L6's that they are the same inside (at least
what you can see through the glass). The plate metal and other visible parts are the same
thickness and the spot welds look the same. Must be something different deeper inside.
Guess I'll have to wait until they go bad to find out.
Anyone who uses 6146 family tubes (bet there are at least a dozen of you) should read
Glen's article on the tube.
fyi - tubes are not pretty at 10x and worse at 30x.
btw - I was just kidding about the 6L6's (especially the shot peened part).
73 Ken kb7rgg
More information about the Heathkit
mailing list