[HCRA] Re: [viennawireless] Digest Number 512

[Daniel J. Sullivan]

Does MD accept PRB-1 as law? They quote the Fedearl Regs but PRB-1 is a
recommendation with some weight not a law. Also, it would seem that as long
as he stays within the engineering guidelines I wouldn't imagine they could
do much to revoke it.

I also would like to know which ham spends $1,000,000 to install 4 towers.
We are all so damned cheap I don't think I know anyone who even spent
$100,000 to install 4 towers! Heck I know people with 100footers who
installed them for less than $500 (gotta love hamfests!)

Dan S.
KO1D
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <viennawireless at yahoogroups.com>
To: <viennawireless at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 6:56 AM
Subject: [viennawireless] Digest Number 512



>
> Message: 1
>    Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:58:41 -0400
>    From: "Pete Norloff" <yahoo at toward.com>
> Subject: FW: N3HBX
>
> This was posted to the LARG reflector:
>
> 73,
> Pete
>
>
>    Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:14:44 EDT
>    From: RWMaylott at aol.com
> Subject: More tower problems for N3HBX
>
> Poor John, N3HBX, who started the ruckus here in Loudoun some few  months
> back when he discovered the pending changes to Loudoun's zoning, gave up
> and
> decided to stay in Maryland.  Apparently he's not out of the woods  yet.
> See
> below (this was posted on the PVRC reflector).
>
> http://www.gazette.net/200433/poolesville/news/230181-1.html
>
>