[HCARC] Antennas, Radios and Elmering

Gary and Arlene Johnson qltfnish at omniglobal.net
Sun Aug 5 19:16:08 EDT 2012


Bill,

You are getting better and better at answering questions - or is it I am 
getting better and better at understanding what you are saying.  Probably 
the first vs the second.

I guess what I need most to do is get my radio, a good tuner even though the 
radio has an automatic tuner, and maybe invest in or borrow an antenna 
analyzer and test out the antenna(s).  As you said in another email I got a 
great deal on them.  For their cost I probably could sell them for scrap for 
more than I paid.  Ebay would even better if they turn out not to work.  Was 
hoping to tempt enough people to come out for some antenna sessions in a 
local park and I would buy donuts.  No takers of the offer yet though.

Gary J
N5"BAA"


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Tynan" <billandmattie at windstream.net>
To: "Gary and Arlene Johnson" <qltfnish at omniglobal.net>; "Bob Richie" 
<bob.k5yb at yahoo.com>
Cc: <hcarc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [HCARC] Antennas, Radios and Elmering


> Gary:
>
> You asked abt what Club members were using. So, OK, here I go. My main rig 
> is a Flex 5000A, software defined radio. I would NOT suggest it for your 
> first rig. One, it is quite expensive - abt $2500. Two, you need a 
> computer to go with it and it should be at least a dual core machine 
> running Window XP or beyond. I am still running XP. It puts out abt 90 
> Watts on 160 thru 6 meters. However, since I have no HF antennas, I have 
> only used it on 6 meters, and with the optional VU module, on 2 meters and 
> 70 cm.
>
> I also have a Yaesu FT-736R with 2 meters, 222 MHz ,432 and 1296 in it. I 
> use it on 222 & 1296 but am in the process of replacing it with 
> transverters for those bands. I also have an Icom 706 Mk2G which covers 
> 160 thru 70 cm. As I recall it only puts out 10 Watts on 70 cm and 50 
> Watts on 2 meters, but 100 Watts on the other bands. It can work SSB, CW 
> and FM. So, it can be used on the Club repeater. It is small and my be 
> more acceptable to a wife who is not too enthused abt ham radio than might 
> some of the boatanchors one runs into, HI!
>
> The newest version of the 706 series is the IC-7000 which has a fancier 
> readout and possibly some other features. The original 706 covered up to 2 
> meters and had only 10 Watts out on 2 meters. The 706s make a fair SSB 
> radios, but are not great on FM. Though they work CW, it is not their 
> strong suit, either. The receive passband is too wide for good CW work. 
> Thus, one can be bothered by QRM from stations near the frequency. I do 
> not know if the 7000 is any better in this regard.
>
> One thought on the AS-2259. I have never seen one and don't even know what 
> one is. But from the discussion, it sounds like it is fed with fairly 
> stout pipe which also serves as the coasual transmission line. If that 
> line of 50 Ohms, then one might be able to use it as the vertical support, 
> then cut 1/4 wave pieces of wire, one set for 80 meters and the other for 
> 40 meters , not using the wires that the AS-2259  comes with. Anything 
> witha 10 to 1 VSWR is a no no. These wires should run out perpendicular to 
> each other as much as possible. The ends can be at ground level or better 
> elevated 6 to 10feet. Depending on how high the center is, you end up with 
> inverted Vs for 80 and 40. The 40 meter wires will also work on 15 meters.
>
> On 80 and 40, the impedance will be close to 50 ohms. Yes a half wave 
> dipole at a fair height above ground has an impedance of about 75 Ohms. 
> But, when the antenna is closer to the ground, such as in an inverted V 
> arrangement, the impedance  is lowered to abt 50 Ohms - just what one is 
> looking for.
>
> If the pipe on the AS-2259 is not long (high) enough, you could get 
> substantial piece of aluminium or steel pipe and lash the AS-2259 feed 
> pipe to it with muffler clamps, thus extending it.
>
> If the AS-2259 feed pipe is not 50 Ohms, forget what I just said and get 
> mast of some sort 20 to 30 feet high and use it to support the two half 
> wave inverted Vs. Don't worry about baluns or the coax radiating. You 
> don't care. Yes, this is a so-called NVIS antenna, but you will be able to 
> work stations 500 to 1000 miles away when conditions are right as well as 
> the ones closer in. You might, or might not, need an antenna tuner to work 
> 15 meters. On 15 meters, it will not be and NVIS as 21 MHz is almost 
> always above the critical frequency (that which is directly reflected back 
> to Earth).
>
> Any kind of vertical antenna will have a lower angle or radiation than the 
> inverted V, and hence has the potential of working stations farther away. 
> However, if it is anything other than a half wave vertical, like a 1/4 
> wave vertical, it will require ground radials - the more the better. AM 
> broadcast stations normally use 120. As sort of minum is 4. If you are on 
> soft ground and have acreage, it is not a big problem to burry radials. Of 
> course,  the expense of buying the wire can present a problem. But if you 
> are on rock as I am, burying radials is a major undertaking.
>
> My understanding is that the Gapp vertical at the Club station is a half 
> wave antenna and thus does not require radials. However, I believe that it 
> works only on 20 thru 10 meters. Someone may correct me on this.
>
> I know that this has been a lot to swallow.
>
> There will NOT be a quiz in the morning.
>
> You asked about Belton. Belton is a hamfest which is held twice per year 
> at the Bell County Exhibition Center south of Temple. I'm sure Google will 
> give you specific dates etc.
>
> I hope this helps too.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill, W3XO/5
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gary and Arlene Johnson" <qltfnish at omniglobal.net>
> To: "Bob Richie" <bob.k5yb at yahoo.com>
> Cc: <hcarc at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 1:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [HCARC] Antennas, Radios and Elmering
>
>
>> Bob,
>>
>> I claim to be someone who doesn't mind moving someone out of their 
>> comfort zone.  As such I have no problem what so ever with someone doing 
>> the same to me.  Smart ass questions can do that and to be really honest, 
>> it felt good to go back and try to remember some of the genetics info 
>> from the far distant past (40+ years ago).  Hard to believe but true.
>>
>> If I eliminate all those criteria when reading eham reviews there aren't 
>> any reviews left to read :-).    Your comments go along way to prove that 
>> the people you ask about a radio should be people you trust, and I can't 
>> think of any group of Hams that I trust better than the members of HCARC. 
>> Hence all the more reason for a listing of what radios each member runs. 
>> I know that we don't like to be on lists, but it surely helps people find 
>> the right people to answer specific questions and since the roster is 
>> password protected, members should be fairly certain that the information 
>> is protected.
>>
>> Gary J
>> N5"BAA"
>>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>>  From: Bob Richie
>>  To: Gary and Arlene Johnson
>>  Cc: HCARC at mailman.qth.net
>>  Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 12:37 PM
>>  Subject: Re: [HCARC] Antennas, Radios and Elmering
>>
>>
>>  I was kind of being a smart ass about the mutation question but it kind 
>> of makes my point and that is "well, it depends." It's kind of like 
>> radioactive decay - it's pretty easy to measure rates over time with 
>> great precision. We have no way to predict when a certain atom will 
>> decay. If you ask 6 hams for an opinion you will get at least thirteen 
>> definite answers and another nine qualified answers. You've gotten 
>> several suggestions for a rig and if you are looking for operating 
>> experience the rig does not matter.
>>
>>
>>  Here are some hints for looking at reviews on e-Ham. Forget the 5s. They 
>> are either from folks who are reporting the radio is performing as 
>> advertised or are brand devotees. Some guys wont drive anything but 
>> Fords. If the reviewer has operated the rig for less than about 90 days 
>> discount the review. If the guy just looked at it and didn't like the 
>> paint color, forget it. If a reviewer complains about a problem no one 
>> else reports, be careful. If a reviewer tries to compare the rig to 
>> another, forget it.
>>
>>  Bob
>>  K5YB
>>  Kerrville, TX 78028
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  From: Gary and Arlene Johnson <qltfnish at omniglobal.net>
>>  To: Bob Richie <bob.k5yb at yahoo.com>
>>  Cc: HCARC at mailman.qth.net
>>  Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2012 11:22 AM
>>  Subject: Re: [HCARC] Antennas, Radios and Elmering
>>
>>
>>
>>  In laymans terms you can't predict purely random mutations.  That's why 
>> they are RANDOM.  In layman's terms you can effect mutations and expect 
>> mutations by bombarding DNA and RNA with radiation.  You cannot predict a 
>> perfectly random distribution of ionizing radiation as to which cell it 
>> might affect.  Since it is purely a random distribution over the 
>> direction the beam of radiation is applied you would expect a random 
>> number of cells to be affected. We are dealing with a purely random 
>> event, although if I were to bombard the cells for a long enough time all 
>> would have mutations, but the cells would be dead first.
>>
>>  My problem with Ohms law is I assume it is NOT RANDOM and that 
>> resistance in a copper wire of 14 guage should be within limits pretty 
>> much the same dependent upon the diameter (gauge of the wire).  This 
>> shouldn't be random - more a function of the ability of a wire to be 
>> drawn to a nominal thickness.  I am told that the resistance of wire 
>> increases as distance increases in a copper wire, hence to run a certain 
>> amount of a/c electricity from my shop to one of my barns (450 feet away) 
>> requires larger and larger wire to reduce the resistance or I guess, to 
>> spread the resistance out over a longer wire diameter.  Said another way, 
>> the longer the distance run, the larger the wire required.   In the 
>> instance of the antenna Coax we were talking about previously, normal 
>> RG58 coax has a copper conductor that is probably somewhere around 20 
>> gauge and it has a 50 ohm resistance.  The hard line mast for the AS-2259 
>> which I am told is COAX  has a conductor inside (copper as far as I can
>> tell) that is approx 1/4 inch in diameter inside of a hard casing with 
>> dielectric that is 1 1/2 inches in diameter - why supposedly does it have 
>> an enormous resistance???  One would guess that the 1/4 inch copper 
>> conductor would have much less reisitance than the much smaller RG58 
>> conductor.  OR somehow the resistance is being affected by other factors 
>> that I am unaware of.  Please explain.
>>
>>  As for a 2 element answer to the radio - yes an Icom 746 might work, so 
>> would Icom 756 and the 756 Pro series of which the 7410 has largely 
>> replaced.  Really the Icom 7600 replaced the the 756's and the 7410 
>> replaced the 746.  Having had a permanent search on Ebay that sends me an 
>> email every time Icom 746 and 756 (and many others too) appears in any 
>> auction I can tell you that the cost for a used one of either is almost 
>> as much as a new 7410.  And BTW, if you ask Dale, the first radios I 
>> talked to him about when I took his course were 746's and 756's.  I have 
>> been compiling some information about radios for other Newbies that I 
>> come across who are looking for radios.  What I cannot ever gain is the 
>> perspective that people have who have operated these radios over a period 
>> of years.  Eham tries to do some of that, but the reviews are as random 
>> as the person operating the radio and that person is unknown.  Who knows 
>> if that person had the smarts to get the SWR low enough that
>>  he didn't fry the transmitter and aren't ALL PROBLEMS THE MANUFACTURERS 
>> PROBLEMS, NEVER THE OPERATOR.  I am smart enough to know that just like 
>> airplane crashes and car accidents - the majority of the time problems 
>> are caused by operator error.
>>
>>  OK, rather than a list of radios that are recommended for Newbies, then 
>> how about in the club roster, each person list the radios they commonly 
>> operate with, so if a newbie or an oldie wanted to know about a certain 
>> radio they would know which members to go and ask.  It doesn't have to be 
>> hard.  As for me, I probably will wait and get either the 7410 or 7600 
>> finances permitting.  I have been saving since I began Dale's Course back 
>> in Feb or March.  However, I was under the impression that this site 
>> (Reflector) was for the benefit of all the members, not just me.  Hence, 
>> when talking about radios, I talk about radios available to more than 
>> just me.  Chuck Hopkins is using my General CLass Exam Book to get his 
>> upgrade. I can guarantee he will be going through the same decisions that 
>> I am when he decides to get his HF radio.  Wouldn't it be nice for him to 
>> have some kind of database of some sort to go through to make an easier 
>> intelligent decision on what to buy or as importa
>> nt - what to stay away from.
>>
>>  Gary J
>>  N5"BAA"
>>
>>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>>    From: Bob Richie
>>    To: Gary and Arlene Johnson
>>    Cc: HCARC Reflector
>>    Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 7:59 AM
>>    Subject: Re: [HCARC] Antennas, Radios and Elmering
>>
>>
>>    OK, you want a simple two element answer. here it is.
>>    Get yourself a good used Icom 746 and a Hustler 4 BTV vertical. You 
>> can easily modify the antenna to add 12 meter and 17 meter capability and 
>> you can screw an 80 meter ham stick into the top to add 80 meters. When 
>> your operating abilities exceed the capability of that system, ask your 
>> questions again.
>>
>>
>>    Don't like that answer? Then try this one. Wait until you can get the 
>> Icom 7410 since that seems to be the rig you want. If you can't get it 
>> right away that's ok. It is a fairly new rig and there may be some new 
>> rig issues to work out.
>>
>>
>>    As for the microbiology, please explain in layman's terms how you 
>> predict mutations.
>>
>>    Bob
>>    K5YB
>>    Kerrville, TX 78028
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    From: Gary and Arlene Johnson <qltfnish at omniglobal.net>
>>    To: HCARC at mailman.qth.net
>>    Sent: Saturday, August 4, 2012 11:45 PM
>>    Subject: [HCARC] Antennas, Radios and Elmering
>>
>>
>>    First to Bill Tynan - IT ALL HELPS - thank you very much for the 
>> response, and you answered my question in terms I could understand.  I 
>> asked what time it was and you told me.  Congratulations, you are one of 
>> the first!!  Barb S. will understand the last comment.
>>
>>    Second to Bob R.  - IT ALL HELPS TOO - However, If I were to have 
>> anywhere close to that many radios I would be divorced - no kidding!!! 
>> My wife is not that supportive of this "Extra Hobby".  It's the single 
>> most important reason why I am trying to find the best fit for being able 
>> to comfortably and reliably communicate with the least amount of gear 
>> trouble possible.  At least at first, I would really like to be able to 
>> eliminate (if at all possible) the radio from being a source of problems. 
>> It's hard enough to learn all (some) that one needs to know without 
>> having to fight a radio too.  Trust me, I have been looking for the right 
>> radio.  The Icom 7410 which I have pretty well settled on (unless I can 
>> afford by some miracle an ICOM 7600 - not likely) as the radio I want to 
>> get pretty well makes it easy for me to get in and get my feet wet - 
>> reliably.  I cringe at the thought of trying to tell my wife I need/want 
>> 4-6 different radios for different things.  As for a nich
>> e -
>>    I am a retired Naval Officer who was fortunate enough in his 24 1/2 
>> year career to have traveled almost completely around the world.  The 
>> only part I haven't been through (and really never wanted to go there) is 
>> from the Indian Ocean side of the Suez Canal to the area around Thailand. 
>> Other than that I have been the rest of the way around this big blue orb 
>> including Antarctica (3 summer seasons) and South Pole.  In fact I was 
>> lucky enough to have been able to make a MARS phone patch from 
>> Amundson/Scott South Pole Station back to California.  Bill Tynan told me 
>> the other night it was too bad I wasn't a HAM at that time so I could 
>> have taken a couple of handy talky's and communicated from each of the 
>> worlds time zones simply by having walked around the South Pole. I desire 
>> to be able to talk as far around the world as possible, to as many people 
>> as possible, as often as possible.  At this point in my Radio experience 
>> I find PSK31 and RTTY somewhat BORING, however I recogni
>> ze
>>    both as being ways to "talk" when propagation on the different bands 
>> is not conducive to SSB.  Yes, I know that CW is even better, and trust 
>> me I will get there, but I am not close to "there" yet.  There are many 
>> things that pull on my time, some of which are raising sheep and goats 
>> and Stock Guard Dogs, being married, and radio has to fit in with those 
>> for time. Thankfully, radio works in the dark of night, and thankfully I 
>> have a good retirement - otherwise there would have been no time to even 
>> start.  If I had to try to juggle full time employment with all the other 
>> things going on I would not have even gotten started in Dale's class 
>> either.  Oh, did I mention I like to fish too??
>>
>>    I do not think I am that much different than most of the new Hams I 
>> have met.  As a group, we seem somewhat frustrated with one thing or 
>> another.  Some of us are trying to find the right radio, others are 
>> struggling with antennas, some are struggling with finances in this poor 
>> economy.  The simple statement of "just get a radio and try it out" seems 
>> the easy way out when someone asking for information.  It might be the 
>> proper response, but I don't think so - yet.  Of the group of Newbies, I 
>> am (probably) the most vocal.  I don't mind trying to move people out of 
>> their comfort zones.  I probably ruin more relationships than I help. 
>> Tilting with windmills is a past time of mine.  And if you haven't 
>> realized it yet I am not afraid to toss in my 2 cents worth - frequently 
>> too my detriment.  The only bad question truely is the one not asked - I 
>> live by that motto.  At least I try though - shy, I am not.
>>
>>    Last to Kerry - IT ALL HELPS TOO!!  However, some things don't seem to 
>> follow as to why some things have high ohms resistance and others - not 
>> so much.  There doesn't seem to be any rhyme nor reason to so much of it. 
>> My Masters is in Microbiology.  In the sciences we were taught that 
>> things should follow in an orderly manner, obeying the rules.  Yeah, sure 
>> they do!!!
>>
>>    I look forward to getting a few antennas and a radio together and 
>> trying them out.  Say when and I will buy the donuts.  Coffee and tea is 
>> BYOB as I am LDS (Mormon - we don't do coffee).  And yes we should do it 
>> when Jeff is available for the donuts.
>>
>>    Gary J
>>    N5"BAA"
>>    ______________________________________________________________
>>    HCARC mailing list
>>    Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hcarc
>>    Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>    Post: mailto:HCARC at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>    This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>    Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> HCARC mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hcarc
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:HCARC at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> 



More information about the HCARC mailing list