[Ham-Mac] new iMac: parallels vs. fusion?

[EZ Rhino]

Thanks John.  I'm planning on a 24".  Ok?

Chris






On Dec 24, 2009, at 21:26 , John L Merrill wrote:

The reviews say Parallels is better and faster. I run 4.0 not the new  
5.0 yet and i like it with XP.
Don't buy the new 27" iMac. They are having troubles with the  
monitors. Apparently the 20.5" one is ok.

73,
John N1JM
late 2008 MacBook pro


On Dec 24, 2009, at 9:19 PM, EZ Rhino wrote:

> 	OK gang,
>
> Looks like I'm taking the plunge.  I'm going to be ordering a new
> iMac in the next day or so.  I currently have an older iMac and run
> MLDX and CocoaModem; really looking forward to the new MLDX.
>
> I'm also excited to start running OSX and XP and using XP to run some
> windows apps such as N1MM.  What is the consensus, parallels or
> fusion?  Anything I need to know before I buy?  Looks like there are
> some rebates that make parallels almost free if I order it with the
> computer.
>
> Chris
> KF7P
>
>
> OH yeah, Merry Christmas!!!
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Ham-Mac mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Ham-Mac at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Ham-Mac mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Ham-Mac at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html