[Ham-Mac] new iMac: parallels vs. fusion?

John L Merrill johnn1jm at gmail.com
Thu Dec 24 23:26:30 EST 2009


The reviews say Parallels is better and faster. I run 4.0 not the new 5.0 yet and i like it with XP. 
Don't buy the new 27" iMac. They are having troubles with the monitors. Apparently the 20.5" one is ok.

73,
John N1JM
late 2008 MacBook pro


On Dec 24, 2009, at 9:19 PM, EZ Rhino wrote:

> 	OK gang,
> 
> Looks like I'm taking the plunge.  I'm going to be ordering a new  
> iMac in the next day or so.  I currently have an older iMac and run  
> MLDX and CocoaModem; really looking forward to the new MLDX.
> 
> I'm also excited to start running OSX and XP and using XP to run some  
> windows apps such as N1MM.  What is the consensus, parallels or  
> fusion?  Anything I need to know before I buy?  Looks like there are  
> some rebates that make parallels almost free if I order it with the  
> computer.
> 
> Chris
> KF7P
> 
> 
> OH yeah, Merry Christmas!!!
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Ham-Mac mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Ham-Mac at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the Ham-Mac mailing list