[Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question

[Charlie T, K3ICH]

Yeah, we all knew that.  I just thought the HT-4 (or BC-610) would be a 
better period match for the SX-42.

73, Charlie k3ICH


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "rbethman" <rbethman at comcast.net>
To: <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question


> The HT-4 *IS* a BC-610.  One is commercial, pretty near not available, 
> since U.S. Government went to Halligan, took his HT-4 - and putting the 
> BC-610 line in full wartime production.  Even Halligan and his assets were 
> incapable of keeping up with demand.
>
> The BC-610s were made by several companies.  The HT-4 "then" became 
> available after wartime.
>
> Bob - N0DGN
>
> On 1/22/2013 8:51 PM, Charlie T, K3ICH wrote:
>> How about an HT-4?
>>
>> Chas
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "K0DAN" <k0dan at comcast.net>
>> To: "Ian Webb" <ianwebb5 at comcast.net>; "'Gary Wells'" 
>> <glwells at yahoo.com>; <Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:23 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question
>>
>>
>>> BC610.
>>>
>>> Something from the late 40's. HT32 family is at least 10 years newer 
>>> than
>>> your SX42.
>>>
>>> See: http://www.antiqueradio.org/art/rn47031.jpg
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ian Webb
>>> Sent: January 22, 2013 01:59 PM
>>> To: 'Gary Wells' ; Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>>> Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question
>>>
>>> I really don't think the HT-32 is a very good match...   Hope somebody 
>>> comes
>>> up with a better idea.
>>>
>>> Ian, K6SDE
>>> Silicon Valley
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: hallicrafters-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>>> [mailto:hallicrafters-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gary Wells
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:20 AM
>>> To: Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>>> Subject: [Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question
>>>
>>> Fellow Hallicrafters enthusiasts, I have a question for the group. I am
>>> rebuilding an SX-42 back to life electrically and cosmetically along 
>>> side an
>>> R-42. My goal was to match it up with a transmitter, hopefully a Hally
>>> version. I realize the SX-42 is more of a general coverage receiver but 
>>> I
>>> assume that some used the ham bandspread as a ham receiver. Was there 
>>> ever a
>>> period matching transmitter for the SX-42? I see the HT-32 is similar
>>> cosmetically but I don't believe the years match up.
>>>
>>> 73's
>>> Gary
>>> WB9AYD
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html