[Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question

[K0DAN]

BC610.

Something from the late 40's. HT32 family is at least 10 years newer than
your SX42.

See: http://www.antiqueradio.org/art/rn47031.jpg

-----Original Message----- 
From: Ian Webb
Sent: January 22, 2013 01:59 PM
To: 'Gary Wells' ; Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question

I really don't think the HT-32 is a very good match...   Hope somebody comes
up with a better idea.

Ian, K6SDE
Silicon Valley

-----Original Message-----
From: hallicrafters-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:hallicrafters-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gary Wells
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:20 AM
To: Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question

Fellow Hallicrafters enthusiasts, I have a question for the group. I am
rebuilding an SX-42 back to life electrically and cosmetically along side an
R-42. My goal was to match it up with a transmitter, hopefully a Hally
version. I realize the SX-42 is more of a general coverage receiver but I
assume that some used the ham bandspread as a ham receiver. Was there ever a
period matching transmitter for the SX-42? I see the HT-32 is similar
cosmetically but I don't believe the years match up.

73's
Gary
WB9AYD


______________________________________________________________
Hallicrafters mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net

List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **


This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html