[Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question

[Bill]

I'd say an HT-9 is closer.
Bill Marx W2CQ


On 1/22/2013 2:59 PM, Ian Webb wrote:
> I really don't think the HT-32 is a very good match...   Hope somebody comes up with a better idea.
>
> Ian, K6SDE
> Silicon Valley
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hallicrafters-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:hallicrafters-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gary Wells
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:20 AM
> To: Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Hallicrafters] Appropriate Matching Transmitter question
>
> Fellow Hallicrafters enthusiasts, I have a question for the group. I am rebuilding an SX-42 back to life electrically and cosmetically along side an R-42. My goal was to match it up with a transmitter, hopefully a Hally version. I realize the SX-42 is more of a general coverage receiver but I assume that some used the ham bandspread as a ham receiver. Was there ever a period matching transmitter for the SX-42? I see the HT-32 is similar cosmetically but I don't believe the years match up.
>
> 73's
> Gary
> WB9AYD
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>