[Hallicrafters] SX-111?
Jim Marshall
jmarshall1945 at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 3 10:34:27 EDT 2012
Bob, I used to have a 111 when I was a new ham about 50 years ago. It had pretty good sensitivity, but drifted a lot. If you are looking at one for a collection, that is fine. But if you want to use it on the air the SX-101 is a lot better receiver. I kind of put the HT-37 and the SX-111 as cheaper and lighter versions of the HT-32 and SX-101. Of course, if you want the ultimate Hallicrafters receiver, get an SX-115, if you can find one. But you will pay big bucks for it.
Jim Marshall, K6OLY
________________________________
From: Bob Macklin <macklinbob at msn.com>
To: Halicrafters <Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 1:03 PM
Subject: [Hallicrafters] SX-111?
I have been looking at a SX-111. I have the impression it is pretty much a
ham band only version of the SX-100.
Am I missing something?
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa.
"Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
______________________________________________________________
Hallicrafters mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list