[Hallicrafters] Best Rx?
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Mon Nov 29 18:43:10 EST 2010
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Nickels" <ranickel at comcast.net>
To: <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] Best Rx?
> On 11/29/2010 3:33 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
>> Its possible the receiver was actually announced
>> mid-year and was changed before the end of year catalogue
>> that appears in this book.
> Perhaps, but the discrepancy is that the description of
> "10 tubes plus
> rectifier" is incorrect if the calibrator is installed,
> since that
> requires a total of of 13 tubes, not 12. My guess is
> this error was
> repeated in all the ad copy and catalogs from the initial
> announcement
> (page 109, Dec. 1959 QST) forward.
>
> 73, Bob W9RAN
I looked again. In the 1959 handbook the receiver is
described as having 10 tubes plus voltage regulator and
rectifier. In the 1962 edition its described as having 12
tubes plus regulator and rectifier. Both ads state it has a
built-in crystal calibrator.
I compared the tube list. The later ad includes a 6AU6
calibrator tube which is not listed in the first ad. The
earlier ad also lists a 6CB6 as the 1650khz IF, this is
shown as a 6DC6 in the later ad. The later ad also lists a
6BY6 as a product detector, also not listed in the earlier
ad. So, the tube count is right but did the earlier version
actually have both calibrator and product detector? The
older ad does mention the selectable side band feature which
suggests it DID have the product detector. But, was the
change in the 1650khz IF tube real or an error.
What may have happened was that the adverstising
department was under the gun to get advertising placed and
did not have correct information from where it was supposed
to come from.
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list