[Hallicrafters] GROL (PG) license

[Roger (K8RI)]

Gary Pewitt wrote:
> You can avoid all these problems with a homebuilt experimental 
> aircraft.  Of course you get a new set of problems having it inspected 
> during the build.
>   
The inspections are simple but through. Plus if you have an EAA advisor 
the only inspection comes when you are getting ready to fly it.  
Documentation OTOH must be through and show you did the majority of the 
work.
However I know of one inspector who insisted on static wicks on a 
fiberglass airplane. My Beech doesn't even have them, although it may 
get them soon.  I had to reset the entire stack twice due to 
precipitation static.  Center became a bit concerned when I had to shut 
all the power off and the transponder disappeared from RADAR.  The NDB 
was the first to go, followed by the VOR and RNAV with the DME following 
that and the coms almost immediately after.

When I finish the G-III I don't want to get any where near those kinds 
of storms.  The G-III and future planes won't even have an NDB.

73

Roger (K8RI)
> Win some, lose some.   73  Gary
>
>
>
>
> On 1/11/2010 11:55 AM, rbethman wrote:
>   
>> Its even dumber than either you pr I portray!
>>
>>
>>
>> Big snip
>>     
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com ** 
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>