[Hallicrafters] SX-88 Thread

[WA1KBQ at aol.com]

Too bad for us they didn't ask you to do the  write-up Carl, the only way we 
would have known the truth! Even bigger than that  is now I don't understand 
why National didn't survive!

-Greg

In a  message dated 2/9/2009 9:30:51 P.M. US Eastern Standard Time, 
km1h at jeremy.mv.com  writes:
A BIG YAWN.

Truth in Advertising regulations werent in effect  in 1954 and QST would 
print anything if paid enough. Reviews were written by  manufacturers ad 
companies. Look at antenna gain claims in QST of that  era.

Without an independent lab evaluation all the hype, blather, and  drivel 
means as much as a politicians promise.

Im going to bed, maybe  some others on here can convince you to just stop 
and drop  this.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From:  <WA1KBQ at aol.com>
To: <ka1kaq at gmail.com>;  <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 9:07  PM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] SX-88 Thread


> Read the 1954  QST SX-88 engineering description  unless you want to 
> call  that
> bull too.
>
> Regards, Greg
>
>  **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the 
>  Grammy
> Awards.  AOL Music takes you there.
>  (http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
>  ______________________________________________________________
>  Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home:  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post:  mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by:  http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:  http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>  

**************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy 
Awards.  AOL Music takes you there. (http://music.aol.
com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)