[Hallicrafters] SX-88 Thread

Carl km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Mon Feb 9 21:30:28 EST 2009


A BIG YAWN.

Truth in Advertising regulations werent in effect in 1954 and QST would 
print anything if paid enough. Reviews were written by manufacturers ad 
companies. Look at antenna gain claims in QST of that era.

Without an independent lab evaluation all the hype, blather, and drivel 
means as much as a politicians promise.

Im going to bed, maybe some others on here can convince you to just stop 
and drop this.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <WA1KBQ at aol.com>
To: <ka1kaq at gmail.com>; <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] SX-88 Thread


> Read the 1954 QST SX-88 engineering description  unless you want to 
> call that
> bull too.
>
> Regards, Greg
>
> **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the 
> Grammy
> Awards.  AOL Music takes you there.
> (http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 



More information about the Hallicrafters mailing list