[Hallicrafters] SX-88 Thread
Carl
km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Mon Feb 9 21:30:28 EST 2009
A BIG YAWN.
Truth in Advertising regulations werent in effect in 1954 and QST would
print anything if paid enough. Reviews were written by manufacturers ad
companies. Look at antenna gain claims in QST of that era.
Without an independent lab evaluation all the hype, blather, and drivel
means as much as a politicians promise.
Im going to bed, maybe some others on here can convince you to just stop
and drop this.
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: <WA1KBQ at aol.com>
To: <ka1kaq at gmail.com>; <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] SX-88 Thread
> Read the 1954 QST SX-88 engineering description unless you want to
> call that
> bull too.
>
> Regards, Greg
>
> **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the
> Grammy
> Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
> (http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list