[Hallicrafters] SX-25
Carl
km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Tue Aug 25 08:51:39 EDT 2009
Since the SX-25 is pretty much a repackaged SX-17 I can understand the
earliest having both RF amps in use which was soon seen unecessary from an
operating viewpoint. Having one less contact on a wafer that remains on the
shaft isnt saving money except maybe to the most anal beancounter. Halli
continued that same switching arrangement thru into the 60's.
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Everette" <radiocompass at yahoo.com>
To: <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>; "jsloss" <k7mks at comcast.net>
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] SX-25
--- On Mon, 8/24/09, jsloss <k7mks at comcast.net> wrote:
> I'm beginning to think Hallicrafters started
> out with one design and then changed it without correcting
> the manual. The SX-25 was designed to use just one RF
> stage on the BC band.
>
> Thoughts appreciated.
I've never seen an SX-25 with the 4-coil arrangement in the radio, on Band
One. I have seen several SX-25's, including early/middle/late.
My best SWAG-method approximation: They may have designed the radio,
initially, to use 2 RF stages on Band 1, e.g. 4 coils; but the bean counters
found a way to make it cheaper... hmm. And, as for the manual.... perhaps
some of those Halli tech writers later went to work for Aerotron, whose
two-way comm gear manuals often contained errors that went uncorrected for
years (if ever!).
73
Mike
WA4DLF
______________________________________________________________
Hallicrafters mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list