[Hallicrafters] Halli equivalent of Drake C-line twins?
tlogan7 at cox.net
tlogan7 at cox.net
Tue Dec 24 13:39:39 EST 2002
Ed and John -
Both your answers were quite helpful and gave me the perspective I needed. This includes how Halli competed with other companies and, in essence, if someone were shopping back then and could not afford a Drake, whay hallicrafter might they buy. As I explore vintage equipment it appears more and more that the C-line twins are very hard to beat - just tough to learn enough to not buy stupidly!!!!
73/Tim
>
> From: Ed Tanton <n4xy at earthlink.net>
> Date: 2002/12/24 Tue PM 01:21:45 EST
> To: "John L." <larry.asp at sympatico.ca>
> CC: tlogan7 at cox.net, hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] Halli equivalent of Drake C-line twins?
>
> I don't think the question was about quality or caliber. I totally agree
> the R4-series is vastly superior to the '146/46 series. I think the intent
> of the question was to learn what the Hallicrafters' intended competition was.
>
>
>
> 73 Ed Tanton N4XY <n4xy at earthlink.net>
>
> Ed Tanton N4XY
> 189 Pioneer Trail
> Marietta, GA 30068-3466
>
> website: http://www.n4xy.com
>
> All emails <IN> & <OUT> checked by
> Norton AntiVirus with AutoProtect
>
> LM: ARRL QCWA AMSAT & INDEXA;
> SEDXC NCDXA GACW QRP-ARCI
> OK-QRP QRP-L #758 K2 (FT) #00057
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF **for assistance**
> dfischer at usol.com
> ----
> Hallicrafters Collectors International: http://www.w9wze.org
> ----
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
>
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list