[GreenKeys] KPH RTTY On Line
kn7sfz
kn7sfz at gmail.com
Sat Nov 7 14:23:51 EST 2020
Thanks Richard,
I can see your AFSK scenario being a problem using standard RTTY 170
split, but perhaps at 850 or higher, the mark would be easier to ignore,
especially with a 500hz CW filter. The brain is a master at blocking
nearby QRM....grey matter DSP!
Not sure what your capabilities are at the station or your bandwidth
limitations.
Richard kn7sfz
On 11/7/2020 10:08 AM, Richard Dillman wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:20 PM kn7sfz <kn7sfz at gmail.com
> <mailto:kn7sfz at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> And for those of us who like CW as well as RTTY, it might be fun
> to copy some streaming KPH Morse!...
>
> (hope I don't get in trouble for this...hi hi) 😁
>
> Kn7sfz
>
>
> You're not in trouble with me!
>
> But for remote Morse keying of the transmitters we quickly found that
> an on/off tone would not cut it. Thus one of our guys engineered and
> built modern equivalents of the send and receive tone sets originally
> used a KPH which employ AFSK.
>
> Reading AFSK Morse by ear turns out to be remarkably difficult. It's
> like one of those visual illusion drawings where first you see one
> thing, then the other. At some point the brain may lock on the mark
> tone and the Morse jumps out at you. But at another point the brain
> may lose that lock and you find yourself trying to copy reverse Morse!
>
> Regards,
>
> RD
>
> =========================
> Richard Dillman
> Inverness Ridge, CA
> =========================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20201107/461bd797/attachment.html>
More information about the GreenKeys
mailing list