[GreenKeys] CRLF or not CRLF?

[David Tumey]

Jeff,
I want to make darn sure I totally understand your thinking here...if I do this (which is exactly what I am doing with the MFJ-1278):
"My contention with the KAM would be using it to decode 60 WPM 5 level Baudot
code and convert it to 110 WPM 8 level ASCII code so you could run a Model 33."

Then when I work RTTY with my Teletype, I am not actually working RTTY with my Teletype....cause I gotta tell you brother, it sure looks, smells and feels like I am working RTTY with my Teletype.
--dave



      From: Jeffrey Angus <jdangus at att.net>
 To: David Tumey <davetumey at yahoo.com> 
Cc: greenkeys <greenkeys at mailman.qth.net>
 Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2017 10:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [GreenKeys] CRLF or not CRLF?
   
 On 7/29/17 9:28 PM, David Tumey wrote:
 
 Jeff, 
  Why not require that the Terminal Unit you describe use Vacuum Tubes only,
 no solid state devices, no fancy transistors, etc. 
  In my mind this all seemed so simple:  You are either using a Teletype to send/
 receive RTTY or you are not.  I don't see how using a KAM or MFJ (Like I do) or
 HAL ST-8000A, etc. makes any difference. 
  --dave W5DT  
  
 Actually there is quite a difference.
 Any of the HAL products are ALL solid state.
 And they are all simple terminal units, tones in, loop keying output.
 My contention with the KAM would be using it to decode 60 WPM 5 level Baudot
 code and convert it to 110 WPM 8 level ASCII code so you could run a Model 33.
 
 By MFJ, are you referring to the 1224?
 <http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/7okAAOSwrfVZWlrE/s-l1600.jpg>
 This is a simple terminal unit.
 
 
 
 -- 
Jeff-1.0
www.foxsmercantile.com
 

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20170730/8a15f325/attachment.html>