[GreenKeys] RTTY HF technician license? Not so fast.
Gerry Block (sbcglobal)
GBLOCK at sbcglobal.net
Wed Feb 2 10:07:41 EST 2005
Jack,
Not exactly but you are certainly managing your
time better. I was supposed to have my HF Rtty
station on the air by the end of this year and guess
what - no time found yet to work on it.
You know I've been driving myself batty trying to
remember who at AT&T gave me that cabinet (it was a
gift if I could get it transported. His name was Doug
and he was a retired VP or something but for the life
of me I can't remember his last name. He was a super
nice gentleman of the old school - must have been
pretty recently retired.
I think at that time Keith and Irv were having their
breakup. There was a fight over who designed the TTL-
II. All I can tell you was Keith drew the schematics
(2x scale, with a marking pen over pencil on an 'E'
sheet..)
Regards
Gerry
--- Original Message ---
From: wa2hwj at att.net
To: "Gerry Block (sbcglobal)" <GBLOCK at sbcglobal.net>,
Gary <gcarlist at garychatters.com>
CC: greenkeys at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [GreenKeys] RTTY HF technician license?
Not so fast.
>Gerry,
>It is a shame youth is wasted on the young...but,
it's been such a long
>time since we met, that we probably both think of
each other
>as teenagers, even now! (boy, do I still remember
that brand new
>28ASR cabinet!!)
>73 OB,
>Jack WA2HWJ
>
>
>
>
>-------------- Original message from "Gerry Block
(sbcglobal)" <GBLOCK at sbcglobal.net>: --------------
>
>
>> FYI I got my novice at 8 and my general at 9 and
was
>> on RTTY at 10.
>>
>> I was using a using TTL-II just designed at that
time
>> by Irv and Keith Petersen. I built it from a copy
of
>> a hand-drawn schematic from Keith later published
in
>> RTTY journal. Still wish I had the demodulator
>> (junked) and the schematic (junked).
>>
>> I made money for all my projects fixing teletype
>> machines. I could disassemble and reassemble a
model
>> 26 or model 15 without manuals (didn't have any).
It
>> was only later I obtained the unobtainium - a model
28
>> built up from parts - from a friend of Keith's at
the
>> Bell system, including a NEW surplus cabinet.
>>
>> My skills were at their peak. All downhill from
there.
>>
>> Ask Jack. He'll vouch for me. It's true.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Gerry
>> AD6MC
>>
>> --- Original Message ---
>> From: Gary
>> To: Eugene Hertz
>> CC: greenkeys at mailman.qth.net
>> Subject: Re: [GreenKeys] RTTY HF technician
license?
>> Not so fast.
>>
>> >Eugene Hertz wrote:
>> >[...]
>> >> Nine-year-olds have passed it. How, I can't
>> imagine). I can not
>> >> imagine how hard the general test would be to
get
>> me the proper
>> >> ability to use RTTY on HF (and run my model 28--
ok,
>> this message is
>> >> only "near-topic").
>> >>
>> >> Very dissapointing and a little discouraging :(
>> >>
>> >
>> >I have a few comments, but, as this is mostly off
>> topic I'll try to keep
>> >them limited.
>> >
>> >- High school age is rather common for getting an
>> amateur radio license.
>> > High schools may have ham radio clubs or
>> stations. My high school
>> >did, and, of course, several students were
licensed,
>> mostly general
>> >class. I think that is a more appropriate age,
>> compared to nine, for
>> >getting kids started.
>> >
>> >- You don't have to imagine how hard the general
test
>> is. The question
>> >pool can be downloaded from the ARRL web site. The
>> conceptual level for
>> >general is about the same as for technician. The
>> emphasis is on HF
>> >operating, but otherwise not greatly different.
>> >
>> >- If you would like to operate HF RTTY the best
>> approach would be to
>> >plan to get a general class license.
>> >
>> >- It has been a while since I actually operated HF
>> RTTY. I got my start
>> >back in high school with a Model 15, a Heathkit DX-
60
>> transmitter, a
>> >Hallicrafters SX-100 receiver and a Twin City TU
>> built from parts picked
>> >up at hamfests and scrounged from old dead TVs. I
>> only operated on 80M
>> >with a dipole back then. For me, making a contact
>> two states away was
>> >DX, but it kind of amazed me how well such a
simple
>> setup could do.
>> >
>> >73,
>> >Gary
>> >[So much for "limited" comments.]
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >GreenKeys mailing list
>> >GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
>> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GreenKeys mailing list
>> GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
>_______________________________________________
>GreenKeys mailing list
>GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
More information about the GreenKeys
mailing list