[GreenKeys] Problems on Proposed Autostart Frequenfy 10.133

[Bob Camp]

Hi,

What is the feeling on a frequency that is not a round multiple of 1 
KHz? We might do better dodging to a mid point (say 10.137500 or 
10.137600) ....

I have to do some antenna work before I can get much up and running. I 
should be monitoring by this weekend.

	Enjoy!

		Bob Camp
		KB8TQ


On May 4, 2004, at 8:48 PM, Roy Norris wrote:

> OK,
>
> I have added 10.136 to my monitoring list.
>
> I think we can rule out 10.135; there is a mixture of a carrier and 
> high
> speed data on that frequency for the last several hours running 10 db
> over
>  S-9.
>
> 10.127, 10.136, and 10.137 are all in the running at this point. If 
> none
> of those work out, I will add 10.134.
>
> Best regards -- Roy, K4EEG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Camp [mailto:ham@cq.nu]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 6:25 PM
> To: Roy Norris
> Cc: Greenkeys
> Subject: Re: [GreenKeys] Problems on Proposed Autostart Frequenfy 
> 10.133
>
> Hi
>
> I simply pulled 10.133 out of the air as a starter frequency. If there
> is a bbs / repeater already on the frequency then we don't want to go
> there. I would suggest that 10.134, 10.135, 10.136 and 10.137 all make
> at least as much sense as 10.133. The only advantage to 10.133 or below
> is that the Norcal single band radio board tunes to about 10.134 with
> the stock crystals. Obviously we could take care of that if we decide
> to make up a set of the boards.
>
> About the only thing I can see about any of the frequencies on the list
> is that 10.136 is a multiple of 8KHz. That's not a big deal but if we
> decide to do a home brew synthesized a transmitter it would come in
> handy.
>
> 	Enjoy!
>
> 		Bob Camp
> 		KB8TQ
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GreenKeys mailing list
> GreenKeys@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
>