[GPS_Standard] Self Test experiment with strange result

[w0ep at w0ep.us]

Isn't that why one would integrate over multiple cycles?


Sent from my android device.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Dimitri.p" <dimitri at dotp.com>
To: gps_standard at mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [GPS_Standard] Self Test  experiment with strange result

Thanks for the reply.
Although it justifies the existence of "0x6800" , if we take 
160000001 and divide it by 16  it results in  10000000.0625 Mhz. Now 
unless I am still missing something any change less that .0625 cannot 
be "seen" by the FLL.
So my realization is in a "best" case scenario when the FLL displays 
6800 the actual oscillator frequency is somewhere either 
exactly  10000000.00000000 or  between  plus or minus 0.06249  MHz

And, correct me if I'm wrong,  if indeed  the Min Max display in 
Montrol is the ppm error the way you described, it will never be able 
to measure anything better than plus or minus 6.25e-9


Dimitri   

______________________________________________________________
GPS_Standard mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/gps_standard
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:GPS_Standard at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html