[FLham] Re: Section News
n4xeo
[email protected]
Wed, 09 Jan 2002 22:27:26 +0000
At 01:16 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Ahoy flham readers:
>
>The ARRL wants and needs to reduce costs of QST magazine
>printed pages or the league's revenue must increase. The
>league/QST has seen a reduction in advertiser revenue so
>they must reduce costs of QST publication or increase
>revenue from members.
>
>Take your pick.
>
>73, Pete K4LDR Citrus County, FL
I'll just snip out everything else in the post instead of putting my
answers in it.
I can sum it up REAL easy in 2 steps.
1. I don't like reading news papers etc on the web. I can take a book
ANYWHERE I want!!!
Number 2 and most important,
What about the MANY people that aren't on the internet or don't even own a
computer???
I know many people that won't or don't have anything to do with computers....
I'm sure that the ARRL can cut costs in other ways... They need to look at
other areas....
What about using cheaper paper?
I find it hard to belive that they are LOOSING money on QST!!! Whith half
of my dues going to QST and ALL of the add $$$ I can't belive it.
I'll leave this here as I can just keep going on. It is like big business,
they always take the easy way out and kill jobs to save money. We all know
that isn't the best way. Same thing here. The BIG picture needs to be
looked at.
Where can I find the stats for QST so I can see for my self that they are
loosing money on QST???
I'm sure that even with reduced adds in QST that ARRL is showing some kind
of profit.
I'm also cc ing this to Frank and Sandy as my protest letter.
73, Bill N4XEO
E- Mail mailto: [email protected]
home page: http://www.qsl.net/n4xeo
F.A.D.C.A.: http://fadca.org
FPAC: http://www.qsl.net/fpac
ICQ: 19219163