[Fists] Technical Jargon
[email protected]
[email protected]
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:26:28 EDT
Well, all I have to say is thank God I had to study all that technical stuff
to get my license, because of it I was able to get my Second Phone and because
of that I made a good dollar on a side job, that was able to get me through
the rough spots.
John, WB2EXI
(same call since 1967)
In a message dated 9/1/03 9:05:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
>
> Chris - and the FISTS reflector.
>
> Good Morning!
>
> To qualify for 5 wpm morse testing took me about 6 weeks of about 3-4 hours
> a week practice.
> That's about 24 hours of work - and some of it fun.
>
> To qualify for my written exams - including learning how to draw all the
> circuits we were tested on, Ohms Law, Kirkoff's Law, Lenz's law, and
> Murphy's Law, elements of Algebra, Trigometery, conversion from polar to
> rectangular coordinates, transmission line theory, propagation theory,
> vacuum tube theory and practice, transistor theory and practice, power
> supplies, full, half-wave, bridge, rectification, switching power supplies,
> Crystal (pierce), Colpits, Hartley, and Armstrong oscillators, Phase lock
> loops, chokes, resistors, transformer theory, capacitance, complex impedanc
> calculation, power factor, basic techniques of RF amplification,
> hetrodyning, phasing, lissojous patterns, neutralization, Amplitude
> modulation, Frequency Modulation, limiter/detectors, diode and product
> detectors, balanced modulators, plate modulation, grid/screen grid
> modulation, Basics of radiotelegraphy by baudot printer, television
> transmission (NTSC standards, chroma, color burst, synch pulse) and
> reception theory, circuit practices at VHF and UHF, frequency measurement,
> lecher wires, gunn diodes, microwave theory took me much longer to study
> for. And of course, we had to study FCC and ITU radio laws and operating
> practices (including Q signals).
>
> I have NEVER used the majority of the technical material that I studied. I
> certainly never had to do anything involving the square root of "negative
> one", so why was I TORMENTED with this requirement?
>
> Why? Because it set me apart from others - it made me qualified. I would
> have some understanding of radio and I would know my surroundings!
>
> I don't know what this big deal is about - the code is nothing compared
with
> the technical requirements.
>
> Or have they changed the technical requirements?
>
> Is that what this is all about? They've watered down the technical
> requirements so they need no study, so let's eliminate the other parts that
> need study?
>
> 73
>
> David J. Ring, Jr., N1EA
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
text/plain (text body -- kept)
message/rfc822
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---