[FADCA] Coordination of Devices

[Doug Christ]

Buddy,

I suggest you share your ideas with us and the FRC. I will be the first to 
admit that I know very little about D Star. While your ideas might be well 
founded, only the FRC will control channel spacing and frequency allocation. 
The better informed they are, the better the decisions should be. You did 
mention the one thing that has me concerned, which is interference. Since 
the conventional digital network is already in place, we need to ensure that 
the burden of resolving interference issues does not fall to us. This is 
assuming that the packet equipment is working correctly. In addition, FADCA 
needs to ensure that there are enough channels intact for our purposes.

Doug/KN4YT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <BEAMAR at aol.com>
To: <fadca at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [FADCA] Coordination of Devices


> Something that needs to be addressed, is the coordination of D Star Data
> Repeaters (DD) and D Star Data simplex operations. Yes, I know that 23 cm 
> is very
> much underutilized and that there is plenty of room for everybody. But, D 
> Star
> Data transmissions require 200 KHz channel spacing and cannot stand
> interference, at all. There are several of us "fooling around" with DD 
> simplex, now -
> and it works great. There are going to be more of us. DD repeaters are 
> going to
> start appearing, soon. Why wait for things to get screwed up? I have some
> ideas...
>
> Buddy Morgan WB4OMG
> Trustee KJ4ACN Port B and C
> Lakeland
>
>
>
> **************
> The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
> Awards. Go to AOL Music.
>
> (http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)
> _______________________________________________
> FADCA mailing list
> FADCA at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fadca
>