[FADCA] More on X.121 address's on the web site

[Russell Oder]

Free, I did not take offense. Thank you for the kind words.  There was a lot 
of stuff I missed since December 03.

Russ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Freeman Crosby" <mail at fcrosby.com>
To: "Florida Amateur Digital Communication Association" 
<fadca at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [FADCA] More on X.121 address's on the web site


> Re-sent, was returned by fadca at mailman.qth.net as undeliverable
>
> Hi Russ,
>
> As Bill said "don't be sorry"
>
> I was in no way criticizing your work, it has been a pleasure to work with 
> you and you did a great job with very little cooperation from
> the rest of the group.
>
> I got into this when they asked for  X.121 addresses and was just 
> unfamiliar with the term (although I'd been using them for years) and 
> where to find them in the data we have.
>
> Also I should not have used the reflector but consulted directly with you 
> and it would have saved a lot of bandwidth.
>
> Once I knew what I was looking for it was easy to parse them out of the 
> other entries in that field, of course to confuse even more on my first 
> try I forgot to tell the program to skip the "D" entries which is where I 
> got the term "garbage" obviously referring to MY ERROR, not yours.
>
> The current page on the site is what we have, hopefully the sysops will 
> update their data with Neil.
>
> I can add the X.121 addresses to whatever sorts are wanted once we get 
> accurate info, in the meanwhile I'll keep them on that separate page.
>
> 73/Free
> W1NPR
>
>
>
> At 06:19 PM 11/28/2005, you wrote:
>>Some of the information that is out of date is due to information being 
>>submitted on new devices and nothing mentoined about older devices in some 
>>instances.  I don't know if this is a case of that, but it happened a lot.
>>
>>As directors are reviewing the database, I had sent a copy of the data 
>>base to all directors some time before I turned over the cooridnation to 
>>Neil, but devices that no longer existed were not always brought to my 
>>attention when new coordinations or updates were sent in. Often the data 
>>submitted at that time did not match what was already in the data base and 
>>it was difficult to determine which data was still good.
>>
>>Sorry.
>>
>>Russ
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by EWOL using Declude Virus]
>
> _______________________________________________
> FADCA mailing list
> FADCA at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fadca