[FADCA] More on X.121 address's on the web site

[Freeman Crosby]

Re-sent, was returned by fadca at mailman.qth.net as undeliverable

Hi Russ,

As Bill said "don't be sorry"

I was in no way criticizing your work, it has been a pleasure to work 
with you and you did a great job with very little cooperation from
the rest of the group.

I got into this when they asked for  X.121 addresses and was just 
unfamiliar with the term (although I'd been using them for years) and 
where to find them in the data we have.

Also I should not have used the reflector but consulted directly with 
you and it would have saved a lot of bandwidth.

Once I knew what I was looking for it was easy to parse them out of 
the other entries in that field, of course to confuse even more on my 
first try I forgot to tell the program to skip the "D" entries which 
is where I got the term "garbage" obviously referring to MY ERROR, not yours.

The current page on the site is what we have, hopefully the sysops 
will update their data with Neil.

I can add the X.121 addresses to whatever sorts are wanted once we 
get accurate info, in the meanwhile I'll keep them on that separate page.

73/Free
W1NPR



At 06:19 PM 11/28/2005, you wrote:
>Some of the information that is out of date is due to information 
>being submitted on new devices and nothing mentoined about older 
>devices in some instances.  I don't know if this is a case of that, 
>but it happened a lot.
>
>As directors are reviewing the database, I had sent a copy of the 
>data base to all directors some time before I turned over the 
>cooridnation to Neil, but devices that no longer existed were not 
>always brought to my attention when new coordinations or updates 
>were sent in. Often the data submitted at that time did not match 
>what was already in the data base and it was difficult to determine 
>which data was still good.
>
>Sorry.
>
>Russ


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by EWOL using Declude Virus]