[FADCA] Protocol Warrior behavior:

[Chuck Hast]

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:08:07 -0500, David Calder <n4zkf at n4zkf.com> wrote:
> This is lengthy but I though it was well written and some would enjoy.
> 
> Happy New Year
> 
> Dave n4zkf

Dave,
I know this guy personally, go to his website and look for FADCA, notice that
we shine in our absence, the reason is mostly based on the fact that we run
FPAC.

He fought the fellows who were doing the ROSE network out in Texas and
Oklahoma tooth and nail, they were just setting up a system that met their
needs, and were not out to fight a war. He has probably cause more damge
in this sense than anyone I know. I hope that he has had a "come to Jesus:"
moment here, but suspect that this is not true.

He was one of the ones who fought the IP initiatives, indeed his NR nodes
were famous for having the IP transport blocked.

If there were ever a IP warrior he is a classical one indeed. Someone drop
him a note and ask him where FADCA and the Texas Rose network groups
or the FPAC groups are on his list of  networks. Ask him where the numerous
IP based networks are, no he is still the same flaming rectal sphencter of
the past, he is just trying to beat his drum in a different manner as he has
become more and more irrelevant as time moves on.

-- 
Chuck Hast 
To paraphrase my flight instructor;
"the only dumb question is the one you DID NOT ask resulting in my going
out and having to identify your bits and pieces in the midst of torn
and twisted metal."