[ETO_Alpha] FS: Last 5 NEW-IN-BOX, never used 3CX800A7's
William P. Osborne
[email protected]
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 08:30:25 -0600
Has anyone on this list purchased samples of these tubes and if so
what was your experience?
Thansk bill, K5ZQ
"Jan C. Robbins" wrote:
>
> Actually, these are the newer, much more robust 3CPX800A7's that Eimac
> recommends to replace the older 3CX's. The good news is: they're NO MORE
> EXPENSIVE than the older weaker model. I can still sell one for $300 +
> $7 to ship, two for $595 shipped fully insured anywhere in the lower 48
> (shipped internationally at buyer's expense). But the bad news is: I
> ONLY HAVE 5 LEFT, and when these are gone I don't expect any more.
>
> #CPX800's are the same as the older 3CX version, but RATED FOR 3500 pv
> idle and 3250 pv full load, while the older ones were only rated for
> 2500/2250. You can actually get 100-200 more watts out of them if you
> run them at higher pv, but their real advantage for most of us is that
> in normal amateur amps they have twice the life or more of the 3CX. I
> have retubed my 87A and two LK-800's with them and don't expect ever to
> retube again.
>
> Don't miss your chance! 73, Jan N0JR
> --
> "There is no end to what you can accomplish
> if you don't care who gets the credit."
>
> _______________________________________________
> ETO_Alpha mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/eto_alpha
--
William P Osborne, PhD & PE
Dean Erik Jonsson School of
Engineering and Computer Science
University of Texas-Dallas
PO BOX 830688
Richardson, TX 75083-0688
Voice 972-883-2974
Fax 972-883-2813
email [email protected]