[Elecraft] OT antenna question

[Clay Autery]

My mistake... doh!  I meant 4.

Increment version by 2... same question... Does NEC-4 handle the phase 
shift through inductors correctly?

It's a big chunk of change to get the NEC-4 license and upgrade the 
front end license...  need to compile multiple reasons to justify it.  
<wink>

Appreciate the catch...

______________________
Clay Autery, KY5G
(318) 518-1389

On 05/28/18 18:36, David Gilbert wrote:
>
> There is no license fee for NEC2, and EZNEC and 4NEC2 both use it freely.
>
> NEC4 is another matter ...
>
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
> On 5/28/2018 4:19 PM, Clay Autery wrote:
>> Mmmm... are you saying that NEC2 handles the phsae shift through 
>> inductors correctly/better?
>>
>> "Looking for reasons to pay the license fee for NEC2)
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> ______________________
>> Clay Autery, KY5G
>> (318) 518-1389
>>
>> On 05/28/18 15:18, Jim Brown wrote:
>>> and is unrelated to the user interface like EZNEC/ELNEC and 4NEC2
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to xdavid at cis-broadband.com
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to ky5g at montac.com