[Elecraft] Compare: K3 to Collins S-line receiver

Don Wilhelm donwilh at embarqmail.com
Mon Jun 4 09:57:46 EDT 2018


Henry,

I believe you will find the arguments similar to those among audiophiles 
when recorded music was changing from vinyl to CDs.
My take on the subject is that the dynamic range of the digital 
techniques exceeded the analog by a wide range you will not be able to 
discern the microprocessor noise at normal or even very high listening 
levels.

Take a look at the dynamic range and MDS of modern hybrid (like the 
K3/K3S) receivers or good SDR receivers (like KX3 or KX2), in comparison 
to some of the best analog receivers, and you should find that the 
dynamic range is much greater (indicating its resistance to overload and 
distortion is greater).  That increased dynamic range gives rise to a 
better MDS - in other words, it can hear weaker signals.
The mathematics in the DSP code is not going to cause distortion unless 
the ADC is overloaded with a strong signal (good design says that should 
not happen).

The Sherwood listings will verify what I am saying - yes, there are 
several analog tube-type radios in the Sherwood listing, but they are 
pretty far down the list.

Any microprocessor noise should only be introduced in the audio section, 
and with good design, that should not happen either - oh yes, if you 
have very good ears, you might be able to hear some at a very low level 
if you turn the AF gain up all the way, but that is not a normal condition.

If your ears feel that the tube audio gear is "warmer" than the solid 
state stuff, then consider that the tube gear generates some 2nd and 3rd 
order distortion which is normally what makes it sound "warmer".  There 
are devices available for solid state audio which add a bit of that 
"warming sound" to better satisfy the ears of those who like to hear it.

Certainly, the large speaker enclosures used with old tube-type radios 
sound much better than the small speakers in compact solid state radios, 
so please don't compare based on those speakers.  Connect a good quality 
audio system to both radios if you want to make a comparison of that sort.

73,
Don W3FPR



On 6/4/2018 8:49 AM, Henry Pollock - K4TMC wrote:
> Yes, I would like to here what others can add to this thread.  One of my
> past hobbies was high-end tube audio electronics, and in numerous set-ups,
> they sounded superior to solid-state equipment.
> 
> So, my additional question would be...is the microprocessor
> noise/distortion affecting the RF signal or just the AF signal, or both?
> 
> 73,
> Henry - K4TMC
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Ron Genovesi <n3eta at coastside.net> wrote:
> 
>> I’m interested. Keep the thread going here
>>
>> Ron Genovesi
>> Sent from My  iPad
>>
>>> On Jun 3, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Kjeld Holm <kh at kh-translation.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Bill,
>>>
>>> Parts of the answer can be found at
>>> http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
>>> search for Collins and you will get some 3 - 5 hits.
>>>
>>> Vy 73 de OZ1CCM, Kjeld
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>>> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill
>>> Sent: 3. juni 2018 15:17
>>> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>> Subject: [Elecraft] Compare: K3 to Collins S-line receiver
>>>
>>> Discounting the digital capabilities such as memories, DSP, etc. and
>>> only considering actual signal reception: I have had S-lines in the past
>>> (dark dim past), so certainly am familier with them. However, as a point
>>> of curiosity, how does the S-line compare to the K3 (only interested in
>>> SSB). Basically, I am interested in how a top of the line analog
>>> receiver does compares to a K3(S)? The question comes from a QSO
>>> regarding the microprocessor noise of modern rigs covering and/or
>>> distorting received signals. Offline response might be good for this, as
>>> I am sure not many would be interested in the subject.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Bill W2BLC K-Line
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to kh at kh-translation.dk
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to n3eta at coastside.net
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to kilo4tmc at gmail.com
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to donwilh at embarqmail.com
> 


More information about the Elecraft mailing list