[Elecraft] 9:1 Balun
Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT
KX3 at ColdRocksHotBrooms.com
Tue Jan 31 20:25:17 EST 2017
That's the problem with oversimplifying an explanation.
I read the original as "is it best practice to always use a 9:1 balun"
and the answer of course is, "if you don't need a 9:1 impedance
transformation, then you don't need a 9:1 balun."
73 -- Lynn
On 1/31/2017 5:17 PM, K9MA wrote:
> On 1/31/2017 19:03, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT wrote:
>> If I did the math right (always a question) your load must be between
>> about 5 ohms and 500 ohms, so if your antenna is about 400 ohms (not
>> resistance, but impedance) then you're okay.
> Not necessarily. That 400 Ohms could be almost pure reactance, like
> 1+j399.999, an almost infinite SWR. That's why ATU specs call out the
> SWR range. Even then, that might be for mostly resistive loads, as
> it's really hard to specify the whole range of impedances an ATU can
> match.
>
> 73,
>
> Scott K9MA
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list