[Elecraft] 200 Hz 5-pole filter

Scott Manthe scott.manthe at gmail.com
Sat Jul 25 16:20:18 EDT 2015


No, and it's also from 2009, but that's not the point. The point is that 
there isn't going to be much difference between the 250hz 8 pole filter 
and the 200hz 5 pole filter. But think about your comment for a moment. 
A stock K3 with no additional filters is that good enough to rank that 
high. It might actually rank higher, because the ARRL and Sherwood 
methodologies differ.

In any case, far too many people are far too concerned about the 
Sherwood rankings. Most people don't understand what the data mean and 
only worry about where a radio ranks on the list. The few dB between 
radios at the top of the Sherwood rankings means the list could probably 
be reordered based on component differences in production runs. 
Certainly a radio near the top ten is good enough.

73,
Scott N9AA


On 7/25/15 3:29 PM, XE3/K5ENS via Elecraft wrote:
> That is not the Sherwood "receiver list" that everyone covets.
>
> Taking this data the K3 would be about 11th or 12th on the list
> with the stock 2.7hz filter.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/200-Hz-5-pole-filter-tp7605299p7605328.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to scott.manthe at gmail.com
> .
>



More information about the Elecraft mailing list